. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 8.

Published in final edited form as: Childs Nerv Syst. 2010 Jul 23;27(2):10.1007/s00381-010-1230-y. doi: 10.1007/s00381-010-1230-y

Table 4.

Discriminant function analysis results

Variable	Group	Canonical correlation^a (explained variance; %)	Classification (% correct)^b	Predicted group membership
Variable	Group	Canonical correlation^a (explained variance; %)	Classification (% correct)^b	Group 1 (%)	Group 2 (%)
Neurological condition	1 (No; n=1,090)	0.4 (16.9)	78.6	92.5	7.5
Neurological condition	2 (Yes; n=319)			69.0	31.0
Attentional problems	1 (Normal; n=1,094)	0.7 (49.3)	88.6	94.1	5.9
Attentional problems	2 (Clinical; n=315)^c			30.8	69.2
Social problems	1 (Normal; n=1,014)	0.6 (37.6)	82.8	92.0	8.0
Social problems	2 (Clinical; n=395)^c			40.8	59.2
Thought problems	1 (Normal; n=1,021)	0.8 (21.7)	78.6	91.6	8.4
Thought problems	2 (Clinical; n=388)^c			55.4	44.6

All correlations are statistically significant, p< 0.0001

Percentage of overall correct classification (i.e., hit ratio). Press’ Q was significant, p< 0.001 for all the classification results

Defined by CBCL national norm, and “clinical” includes sample whose scores fall into eithear borderline clinical or clinical ranges