Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Jul 8;143(2):895–913. doi: 10.1037/a0033580

Table 3.

Logistic mixed-effects regression results for word fixation probability

Model
Values
Model comparison
b SE z p low median high AIC+ χ2 p
(Intercept) −5.75 .31 −18.78 .000

word n−1 frequency .02 .02 .94 .35 .43 .49 .54 −1 .88 .348
predictability −.28 .02 −16.86 .000 .49 .50 .54 294 296.0 <.001
length −.21 .04 −4.68 .000 .55 .49 .36 20 22.12 <.001

word n frequency .03 .02 1.22 .22 .71 .67 .40 −1 1.48 .223
predictability −.18 .02 −11.49 .000 .58 .47 .36 132 133.78 <.001
length .99 .08 12.66 .000 .34 .69 .88 158 159.79 <.001

word n+1 frequency .06 .02 3.62 .000 .49 .48 .52 11 13.16 <.001
predictability −.15 .02 −9.70 .000 .48 .52 .56 93 95.48 <.001
length −.11 .04 −2.57 .010 .54 .49 .46 5 6.63 .010

character before word frequency .01 .02 .51 .610 .47 .48 .52 −2 .26 .610
complexity .05 .00 7.09 .000 .50 .53 .48 48 50.36 <.001

average of characters of wordn frequency −.01 .03 −.21 .840 .65 .62 .46 −2 .04 .837
complexity .06 .01 6.88 .000 .45 .51 .62 45 47.52 <.001

Character after word frequency −.02 .02 −1.34 .180 .49 .48 .52 0 1.80 .180
complexity −.02 .01 −2.66 .008 .50 .53 .48 5 7.06 .008

nearest fixation distance 2.40 .02 98.53 .000 .09 .97 .97 30334 30336 <.001