Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 8;9(1):e85346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085346

Table 1. Association of MT staining and clinicopatological factors. Tumor type not taken into account.

Factor Number of studies Number of participants OR/HR* (95% CI) Heterogeneity Publication bias Model
P-value I2 (%) P-value
Age 9 1069 1.07 (0.82–1.39) 0.679 0.00 0.117 Fixed effects
Gender 9 944 0.99 (0.74–1.34) 0.393 5.08 0.611 Fixed effects
Tumor vs. control 31 2454 1.19 (0.47–3.01) 0.000 89.58 0.236 Random effects
Tumor stage 19 1237 1.15 (0.74–1.77) 0.000 60.83 0.987 Random effects
Tumor size 6 1962 1.37 (0.45–4.13) 0.000 90.88 0.194 Random effects
Tumor grade 33 2504 1.58 (1.08–2.30) 0.000 66.57 0.886 Random effects
Metastases, nodal + distant 21 1987 1.59 (1.03–2.46) 0.000 71.68 0.039 Random effects
Metastases, distant 6 741 1.56 (0.56–4.37) 0.014 64.82 0.075 Random effects
Metastases, nodal 15 1246 1.62 (0.98–2.68) 0.000 72.92 0.201 Random effects
Overall survival 10 2041 2.04 (1.47–2.81) 0.000 97.69 0.572 Random effects

Heterogeneity of studies analyzed using Cochran's Q-test (p-value displayed) and using I2. Egger's two-tailed test used for publication bias analysis (p-value displayed). * effect measure is odds ratio, OR, except for survival analysis using hazard ratio, HR. CI, confidence interval