Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 13;4(4):528–540. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2013-07-RA-0048

Table 2.

Post-Intervention Survey Results (n = 15). Survey data were collected according to a 5 point Likert scale with 1 = Strongly Agree, 2 = Agree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Disagree, and 5 = Strongly Disagree. Note. CDS = Clinical decision support, RTN = Renal template note, AKI = Acute kidney injury, CKD = Chronic kidney disease.

Survey Item Mean (±SD) or No. (%)
The intervention made you more aware of renal failure. 1.8 (±0.56)
The operability of the CDS was user friendly. 2.27 (± 0.70)
Compared to pre-RTN, Length of documentation time.
Less 4 (26.7)
Same 7 (46.7)
More 4 (26.7)
Do you plan to pursue a career in Nephrology?
Yes 1 (6.7)
No 13 (86.7)
Unsure 1 (6.7)
The intervention improved your knowledge of AKI. 2.47 (± 0.91)
The intervention improved your knowledge of CKD. 2.2 (± 0.94)
You feel it is important to document outpatients with CKD. 1.4 (± 0.67)