Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 20;4(4):541–555. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2013-06-RA-0042

Table 2.

The information items analyzed in CXR reports using X2 test (at significance level of 0.05

Information items in CXR reports df % of pre-imp (N = 250) % of post-imp (N = 210) Pearson chi-square P value
Patient name 1 100 100 * *
Patient age 1 0 77.6 399.39 0.000
Patient gender 1 100 100 * *
Patient chart number 72 100 53.12 0.000
Urgency/Normal status of requisition 1 0.4 34.8 99.82 0.000
Position & Technique 1 0 92.8 402.96 0.000
Referring physician name 1 0 43.8 136.9 0.000
Request date 1 0 93.3 406.56 0.000
Name & signature of the reporting radiologist 1 100 99.5 1.19 0.275
General organization 1 62.4 99 92.81 0.000
Appropriate terminology & abbreviation 1 1.2 0.5 2.53 0.111
Important findings discussed 1 31.6 17.1 12.72 0.000
Negative findings reported 1 2.8 4.3 0.75 0.386
Clear & Logic conclusion 1 0.4 0.9 0.53 0.463
Final Diagnosis/ Differential Diagnosis 1 0.4 0 0.35 0.356
Proposed follow up tests 1 5.2 8.1 1.56 0.210

* Not computable