Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 4;4(4):569–582. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2013-04-RA-0021

Table 2.

Comparing interruptive and non-interruptive CDS in terms of sensitivity and specificity.

Reference Standard: Nursing assessment Interruptive CDS (Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2009) Non-interruptive CDS (Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2010) Chi-square
Sensitivity [95% CI]
Unadjusted 24% [17%, 32%] 14% [9%, 21%] 4.19 (p = 0.04)*
Clustering Adjustment 24% [16%, 32%] 14% [6%, 22%] 4.17 (p = 0.04)
Specificity [95% CI]
Unadjusted 99% [97%, 99%] 98% [97%, 99%] 0.63 (p = 0.43)*
Clustering Adjustment 99% [98%, 100%] 98% [97%, 99%] 0.63 (p = 0.43)

*Pearson chi-square test;

† Mantel-Haenszel test