Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 7;20(1):290–295. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i1.290

Table 3.

Correlations between preoperative factors and lymphatic metastasis (n = 63)

Variable No-LM (n = 31) LM (n = 32) Univariate Multivariate
P value OR 95%CI P value
Age 0.015a 6.240 1.66-22.41 0.007a
< 60 yr (n = 28) 9 19
≥ 60 yr (n = 35) 22 13
Gender 0.082 2.532 0.70-9.28 0.155
Male (n = 23) 8 15
Female (n = 40) 23 17
Jaundice 0.062 3.100 0.59-16.32 0.182
Present (n = 12) 3 9
Absent (n = 51) 28 23
CA 19-9 elevation 0.014a 5.700 1.48-22.00 0.011a
Present (n = 26) 8 18
Absent (n = 37) 23 14
CA 125 elevation 0.165
Present (n = 9) 2 7
Absent (n = 54) 29 25
CEA elevation 0.805
Present (n = 13) 6 7
Absent (n = 50) 25 25
Adjacent organ invasion at CT imaging 0.476
Present (n = 21) 9 12
Absent (n = 42) 22 20
Dilatation of the common bile duct at CT imaging 0.784
Present (n = 11) 5 6
Absent (n = 52) 26 26
a

P < 0.05 between lymphatic metastasis (LM) and no-LM groups. CA: Carbohydrate antigen; CEA: Carcinoembryonic antigen; CT: Computed tomography.