Table 3. Comparison of the prevalence of different histological variants of FSGS in different studies. All figures are in percentages (%).
Present (Pakistani) | Nada et al. (Indian) | Deegens et al. (Dutch) | Shi et al. (Chinese) | Thomas et al. (Multiethnic) | Testagrossa et al. (Brazilian) | |
FSGS-NOS | 76.6 | 72.5 | 55.9 | 32 | 42 | 38.2 |
Collapsing | 12 | 2 | 6.9 | 5 | 11 | 36.6 |
Tip | 9.8 | 13.5 | 4.8 | 37 | 17 | 14.5 |
Perihilar | 1.1 | 4 | 6.9 | 26 | 26 | 6.9 |
Cellular | 0.5 | 8 | 25.5 | 0 | 3 | 3.8 |