Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 1;2(1):28–35. doi: 10.5812/nephropathol.8959

Table 3. Comparison of the prevalence of different histological variants of FSGS in different studies. All figures are in percentages (%).

Present (Pakistani) Nada et al. (Indian) Deegens et al. (Dutch) Shi et al. (Chinese) Thomas et al. (Multiethnic) Testagrossa et al. (Brazilian)
FSGS-NOS 76.6 72.5 55.9 32 42 38.2
Collapsing 12 2 6.9 5 11 36.6
Tip 9.8 13.5 4.8 37 17 14.5
Perihilar 1.1 4 6.9 26 26 6.9
Cellular 0.5 8 25.5 0 3 3.8