Table 9.
Low‐Intermediate Risk | High Risk | Very High Risk | |
---|---|---|---|
Risk Category by FRS Alone | New Risk Category Using FRS+RHI | ||
Patients Without Cardiovascular Events | |||
Low‐intermediate risk | 0 | 0 | 0 |
High risk | 65 | 117 | 88 |
Very high risk | 4 | 33 | 33 |
Patients With Cardiovascular Events | |||
Low‐intermediate risk | 0 | 0 | 0 |
High risk | 3 | 28 | 41 |
Very high risk | 2 | 5 | 23 |
Risk Category Using FRS+BNP+SYNTAXsc | New Risk Category Using FRS+BNP+SYNTAXsc+RHI | ||
---|---|---|---|
Patients Without Cardiovascular Events | |||
Low‐intermediate risk | 54 | 19 | 0 |
High risk | 59 | 80 | 22 |
Very high risk | 15 | 23 | 68 |
Patients With Cardiovascular Events | |||
Low‐intermediate risk | 2 | 4 | 0 |
High risk | 4 | 16 | 18 |
Very high risk | 1 | 4 | 53 |
According to the Framingham Risk Score, which was calculated for a 2‐year cardiovascular event risk, low‐intermediate risk was <12%, high risk was 12% to 25%, and very high risk was more than 25%. The overall net reclassification index was 34.5%, P<0.0001 when used in combination with FRS alone, and 29.2%, P<0.0001 when used in combination with FRS+BNP+SYNTAXsc. BNP indicates B‐type natriuretic peptide; CAD, coronary artery disease; FRS, Framingham Risk Score; RHI, reactive hyperemia‐peripheral arterial tonometry index; SYNTAXsc, Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery score.