Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 19;2(6):e000426. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000426

Table 12.

Reclassification by Ln_RH‐PAT Ratio Addition to FRS Alone and FRS, BNP, and SYNTAXsc (n=526)

Low‐Intermediate Risk High Risk Very High Risk
Risk Category Using FRS Alone New Risk Category Using FRS+Ln_RH‐PAT Ratio
Patients Without Cardiovascular Events
Low‐intermediate risk 2 0 0
High risk 128 175 93
Very high risk 6 13 15
Patients With Cardiovascular Events
Low‐intermediate risk 0 0 0
High risk 8 40 43
Very high risk 0 5 8
Risk Category Using FRS+BNP+SYNTAXsc New Risk Category by FRS+BNP+SYNTAXsc+Ln_RH‐PAT Ratio
Patients Without Cardiovascular Events
Low‐intermediate risk 134 30 0
High risk 45 92 25
Very high risk 7 26 63
Patients With Cardiovascular Events
Low‐intermediate risk 6 4 0
High risk 2 19 18
Very high risk 1 3 51

According to the Framingham Risk Score that was calculated for a 2‐year cardiovascular event risk, low‐intermediate risk was <12%, high risk was 12% to 25%, and very high risk was >25%. The overall net reclassification index was 41.3%, P<0.0001 when Ln_RH‐PAT ratio was used in conjunction with FRS alone, and 20.8%, P=0.0003 when used in conjunction with FRS+BNP+SYNTAXsc. BNP indicates B‐type natriuretic peptide; FRS, Framingham Risk Score; RH‐PAT, reactive hyperemia‐peripheral arterial tonometry; SYNTAXsc, Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery score.