Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 19;2(6):e000426. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000426

Table 13.

Reclassification by Ln_RH‐PAT Ratio Addition to the FRS Alone and the FRS, BNP, and SYNTAXsc in CAD Patients (n=440)

Low‐Intermediate Risk High Risk Very High Risk
Risk Category by FRS Alone New Risk Category Using FRS+Ln_RH‐PAT Ratio
Patients Without Cardiovascular Events
Low‐intermediate risk 0 0 0
High risk 46 132 91
Very high risk 2 28 40
Patients With Cardiovascular Events
Low‐intermediate risk 0 0 0
High risk 2 29 41
Very high risk 1 10 18
Risk Category Using FRS+BNP+SYNTAXsc New Risk Category Using FRS+BNP+Syntaxsc+Ln_RH‐PAT Ratio
Patients Without Cardiovascular Events
Low‐intermediate risk 54 19 0
High risk 41 95 24
Very high risk 5 36 65
Patients With Cardiovascular Events
Low‐intermediate risk 3 3 0
High risk 1 21 16
Very high risk 1 4 52

According to the Framingham Risk Score, which was calculated for a 2‐year cardiovascular event risk, low‐intermediate risk was <12%, high risk was 12% to 25%, and very high risk was more than 25%. The overall net reclassification index was 23.3%, P=0.0045 when used in combination with FRS alone, and 24.4%, P<0.0001 when used in combination with FRS+BNP+SYNTAXsc. BNP indicates B‐type natriuretic peptide; CAD, coronary artery disease; FRS, Framingham Risk Score; RH‐PAT, reactive hyperemia‐peripheral arterial tonometry; SYNTAXsc, Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery score.