Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 19;2(6):e000568. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000568

Table 2.

Completed Studies of Mobile Technology for Cardiac Rehabilitation for Ischemic Heart Disease

Author/Year/Country Design/Duration Theoretical Foundation Non‐mHealth Components mHealth Components Intervention Control Outcomes
Worringham20
2011
Australia
Observational
6 weeks
None Telephone contact pre‐ and postexercise session with provider. Smartphone, smartphone application, single‐lead ECG, GPS with real‐time transmission to providers. Monitored exercise training (walking) 3 times weekly assisted by smartphone application. (N=6) None Usability: 80% of sessions no technical problems. Ease of use rated 4.8/5 (95% CI 4.6 to 5.0).
Participation: Completed 80% of scheduled exercise sessions.
Exercise Capacity: 6MWT improved from 524 to 637 m (P=0.009).
Health Status: SF36 Physical Health increased from 50.0 to 78.4 (P=0.03), Mental Health unchanged.
Events: None
Korzeniowska‐Kubacka21
2011
Poland
Nonrandomized clinical trial
8 weeks
None Supervised exercise sessions at outpatient clinic.
No additional intervention specified as adjunct to home sessions.
Mobile device with preprogrammed exercise training sessions with audio and visual cues for training intensity and 3‐lead ECG monitor. Data transmitted via mobile phone. 10 clinic supervised exercise sessions followed by 14 home exercise sessions with mobile application (3 sessions per week). (N=30) 24 clinic supervised exercise sessions (3 sessions per week). (N=32) Exercise Capacity: 17.6±16.1% improvement mobile vs 11.5±35.9% control (P>0.05).
Risk Factors: BP not significantly changed in either group.
Events: not reported
Blasco22
2012
Spain
RCT
12 months
None In person assessment. Lifestyle counseling.
Intervention participants also supplied with blood pressure cuff, glucose and lipid meter as well as education on use.
Mobile phone with structured questionnaires for entry and transmission of blood pressure, heart rate, weight, glucose, and lipids. SMS messaging of recommendations. Lifestyle counseling, mobile intervention, devices for home monitoring. (N=102) Lifestyle counseling (N=101) Usability: mHealth group completed 89% of entries. 5/102 dropped out due to difficulty with mHealth intervention.
Physical Activity: 75% met goals in mHealth group vs 73% control.
Risk Factors: mHealth group more likely to improve at least 1 risk factor kor (RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.7) (primary outcome). mHealth group more likely to achieve goals for BP (62.1% vs 42.9%), hemoglobin A1c (86.4% vs 54.2%), and BMI (0.37 kg/m2 decrease vs 0.38 increase). No significant differences in smoking cessation, cholesterol, medication adherence.
Events: 5 deaths in control group, 0 in mHealth group

6MWT indicates 6‐minute walk test; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; ECG, electrocardiogram; GPS, global positioning system; RCT, randomized clinical trial; RR, relative risk; SF‐36, short form 36; SMS, short message service.