Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 19;2(6):e000399. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000399

Table 7.

Incremental Utility of Biomarkers Over Clinical Risk Factors and BNP Within Clinical Subgroups

Composite LVH_80 LVSD_MILDGR
With MI
NRI 0.580 (0.133, 1.028) 0.834 (0.429, 1.239) 0.276 (−0.161, 0.713)
P Value for NRI 0.018 0.0002 0.220
Without MI
NRI 0.178 (0.081, 0.275) 0.225 (0.124, 0.326) 0.297 (0.096, 0.498)
P Value for NRI 0.0004 0.00002 0.004
≥65 years
NRI 0.084 (−0.075, 0.243) 0.227 (0.066, 0.389) 0.260 (−0.022, 0.541)
P Value for NRI 0.305 0.006 0.073
<65 years
NRI 0.274 (0.156, 0.392) 0.281 (0.154, 0.409) 0.202 (−0.01, 0.413)
P Value for NRI 0.00001 0.00002 0.062
With HTN
NRI 0.246 (0.114, 0.378) 0.306 (0.172, 0.441) 0.270 (0.035, 0.505)
P Value for NRI 0.0003 0.00001 0.025
Without HTN
NRI 0.128 (−0.011, 0.266) 0.173 (0.021, 0.324) 0.112 (−0.132, 0.356)
P Value for NRI 0.073 0.027 0.371

Values represent net reclassification improvement (NRI) and P‐values for comparison between a model including risk factors plus BNP and a model including risk factors, BNP, and novel biomarkers. We did not observe any statistically significant change in the C‐statistic between these models; therefore we did not report data on the C‐statistic. BNP indicates B‐type natriuretic peptide; HTN, hypertension; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; LVSD, left ventricular systolic dysfunction; LVSD_MILDGR, mild/greater LVSD.