Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 15;2:216. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.2-216.v1

Table 1. Effects of pH and buffering on terminal morphology and statistical analysis for experimentally matched RLS data shown in Figure 1.

pH Buffer or pH
adjusted by
Median
RLS
RLS vs.
YPD P
Budded Unbudded %B RLS B %U RLS U B&U vs. YPD
P value
8.0 NaOH 28.5 0.7658 18 22 45.0 23 55.0 30.5 0.3711
7.8 Tris buffer 27 0.1754 23 17 57.5 27 42.5 26 1
7.0 MOPS buffer 30 0.4161 21 19 52.5 25 47.5 36 0.8224
7.0 Tris buffer 27 0.3653 21 18 53.8 25 46.2 28 0.8224
6.8 YPD 29 - 23 17 57.5 25 42.5 34 -
6.0 MES buffer 21.5 0.0165 13 27 32.5 16 67.5 22 0.0424
5.6 Acetate buffer 20.5 0.0896 15 25 37.5 18 62.5 25 0.1165
5.0 HCl 22.5 0.0218 11 29 27.5 18 72.5 23 0.0123
5.0 Acetic acid 28 0.8869 14 25 35.9 25 64.1 30 0.0722
3.0 Citrate buffer 25.5 0.3412 11 29 27.5 26 72.5 25 0.0123

RLS, median replicative lifespan; U, unbudded; B, budded.