Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 5;4(1):19–27. doi: 10.1534/g3.113.005652

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Comparison of the unidirectional overlapping gene length distributions between simulated (scenario 1) and empirical data. (A) Hypothetical prokaryotic overlap lengths of unidirectional adjacent genes, calculated from simulated dataset (simulated parameters: GC content = 50%; criterion = Both; proportions of start codons = TRUE). Frequencies of overlaps in both phases were weighted according to the mutation rate between phase 1 and phase 2 simulations (rate = 1.59; see Table 1). Frequency proportions used were as follows: phase 1 = 38.6%; and phase 2 = 61.4%. (B) Distribution of empirical prokaryotic overlap lengths of unidirectional adjacent genes calculated from a nonredundant set of 400,363 overlapping gene pairs (phase 1 = 31.6%; phase 2 = 68.4%).