Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 10.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Pathol. 2013 Mar 1;44(8):1508–1515. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2012.12.003

Table 2.

Association between Clinicopathologic factors, including IMP3 expression, and Relapse Free Survival

Parameter Number of patients Survival (months) Median ± SE 95% confidence interval P value (univariate) P value (multivariate)
IMP3 composite score
0-100 (negative-mildly positive) 12 75.6 ± 7 61.8 – 89.4 0.09 NS
101-200 (moderately positive) 17 81.3 ± 11.7 58.4 – 104.5
>200 (strongly positive) 14 48.4 ± 13.5 22.1- 74.9
Age
> 65 years 25 70.6 ± 9.3 52.2 – 88.8 0.02 0.023
≤ 65 years 18 75.6 ± 10.7 54.7 – 96.5
FIGO stage
1 and II 26 91.2 ± 7.1 77.3 – 104.8 0.002 NS
III and IV 17 16.5 ± 2.0 12.5 – 20.5
Architectural pattern In >50% of tumor
Glandular 17 71.8 ± 10.5 51.2 – 92.5 NS NS
papillary 12 64.4 ± 15.8 33.3 – 95.4
Solid 10 37.4 ± 3.4 30.5 – 44.1
cystic 4 60.3 ± 18.5 24.1 – 96.6
Lymph nodes
positive 8 13.7 ± 2.8 8.2 - 19.1 0.002 NS
negative 29 84.1± 8.1 96.1- 101.4
Lymphovascular Invasion
positive 20 70.1 ± 11.1 48.4- 91.8 NS NS
negative 22 76.4 ± 8.9 58.9-93.9
Myometrium invasion
>50% 19 57.2 ± 9.3 38.1 – 76.4 NS NS
≤50% 24 81.3 ± 10.4 62.7 – 98.5
Unknown 1
Mitotic index
>4 12 68.9 ± 13.4 42.7 – 95.2 NS NS
≤4 31 77.3 ± 7.6 61.3 – 91.2
Architectural gradea
A+B 24 77.1 ± 9.4 58.6 – 95.5 0.09 NS
C 19 32.6 ± 3.6 25.6 – 39.6

NS: not statistically significant (all p values between 0.05 and 0.09999 are listed); SE standard error; FIGO international Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

a

Architectural grade per Yamamoto et al criteria (10)