Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 29.
Published in final edited form as: Biochemistry. 2013 Oct 15;52(43):7678–7688. doi: 10.1021/bi400962r

Table 1.

DSC dataa and dimer dissociation constants (Kd) for selected PR constructs

(A)
Protein Tm (−DRV) Tm (+DRV) ΔTm (I)b
PR 65.7c 88.1c 22.4
PRL33F/E34D/L63P nd 85.4 --
PR20d 71.7 77.0 5.3
ANAM-11d 70.5 81.9 11.4
PRT26A 60.0 63.0 3.0
PR20T26A 67.5 67.5 0
PRT26A/L33F/L63P 68.1 67.1 −1.0
(B)
Protein T m T m ΔTm (I)b ΔTm (Sc)e Kd (μM)
(− RPB) (+ RPB)
PRf 56.6 65.8 9.2 11 (− RPB) <0.01c
ScPRf 67.6 75.4 7.8 9.6 (+ RPB) --
(− DRV) (+ DRV)
PRD25N 58.4c 61.5c 3.1 9.0 (− DRV) 1.3c
ScPRD25N 67.4 70.3 2.9 8.8 (+ DRV) --
a

At pH 4.7-5.0 in sodium acetate buffer unless noted otherwise

b

Tm(+inhibitor)-Tm(−inhibitor)

c

cited from reference21; an approximately 100-fold increase in Kd observed based on the active site mutation D25N in PR accompanies ~106-fold weaker binding of DRV

d

reference9

e

Tm(single chain)-Tm(homodimer)

f

in 25 mM sodium formate, pH 3.6

nd (not determined) due to more rapid autoproteolysis than PR, see Figure 2