TABLE 1.
Parameter | Control | PD | NS |
---|---|---|---|
αao(0) (s −1) | 22.3 | 22.3 | 22.3 |
zao | 0.294 | 0.294 | 0.294 |
βoa(0) (s −1) | 0.047 | 0.047 | 0.047 |
zbo | −1.577 | −1.577 | −1.577 |
κf (s−1) | 23.8 | 23.8 | 23.8 |
κb (s−1) | 36.8 | 36.8 | 36.8 |
αa1(0) (s−1) | 13.7 | 13.7 | 54.9 |
za1 | 0.955 | 0.955 | 0.955 |
βa1(0) (s−1) | 0.069 | 0.069 | 0.017 |
zb1 | −1.045 | −1.045 | −1.045 |
αi(0) (s−1) | 90.8 | 45.4 | 45.4 |
zai | 0.585 | 0.585 | 0.585 |
βi(0) (s−1) | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 |
zbi | −0.817 | −0.817 | −0.817 |
See Scheme 2 for kinetic model. The only change in parameter values for PD simulation was a 50% reduction in the “O” to “I” transition rate (highlighted in bold). The changes in parameter values for NS simulation included: 50% reduction in the “O” to “I” transition rate, a 4-fold increase in the “C2” to “O” transition rate, and a 75% reduction in “O” to “C2” transition rate (highlighted in bold).