Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 28;2013:732650. doi: 10.1155/2013/732650

Table 1.

Comparison of the proposed approach and the naïve approach.

Proposed method Naïve approach
Top (PRE) 83 (8.84%) 75 (7.99%)
MR (MRR) 169.04 (12.59%) 180.49 (13.44%)
AUC 88.44% 87.57%