Table 1.
The literature search for rates of revision by bariatric procedure.
| Author, location | Surgery | Weight recidivism rate (%) | Timeframe to weight recidivism (months) | Revision surgery | Revision rate (%) | Revision rate (weight recidivism) (%) | Timeframe to revision (months) | Complication rate (%) | 2nd revision surgery | Timeframe to 2nd revision (months) | 2nd revision rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abu-Gazala and Keidar [9], Israel | LAGB | 22.2 | — | LSG, LRYGB, LBPD-DS, and LBPD | Total: 6.6, LSG: 2.64, LRYGB: 2.64, and LBPD-DS: 1.32 | — | 36 | — | — | — | — |
| Acholonu et al. [26], United States | LAGB | — | — | LSG | 2.7 | — | 34.7 (16–60) | — | — | — | — |
| Ardestani et al. [5], United States | LAGB | 24.4 | 24 | LAGB revision (reband or reposition)/LAGB Removal | 15.3/2.6 | 84.2 of LAGB revisions | Revision in 21.5 (0–49), conversion in 27.6 (11–48) | Revision 4.3, conversion 10.5 | LAGB revision/reLAGB-RYGB | — | LAGB revision: 22.6, reLAGB-RYGB: 5.3 |
| Bardsley and Hopkins [27], Australia | LAGB | — | — | All procedures | 13 | 2.6 | 3–36 | — | — | — | — |
| Biertho et al. [10], United States | LAGB | 17.4 | — | ReLAGB (with BPD), LAGB removal (with LRYGB) | Total: 4.7, reLAGB: 2, LAGB removal: 0.2, reLAGB-BPD: 0.5, LAGB removal-LRYGB: 1.9 | — | 22.8 ± 2.4 | ReLAGB: 8.1, LAGB removal-LRYGB: 6.3, ReLAGB-BPD: 25.3 | — | — | — |
| Brolin and Asad 2009 [28], United States | All procedures | — | — | All procedures | 9.8 | 6.6 | — | 33 | — | — | — |
| Brolin and Cody 2007 [53], United States | LRYGB | — | — | Distal LRYGB | — | — | — | 18.5 | — | — | — |
| Christou et al. [6], Canada | LRYGB | 18/35 | 60/120 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Deylgat et al. [29], Belgium | LAGB/LSG | — | — | LRYGB | — | LAGB: 38.9, LSG: 8.3 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Hedberg et al. [54], Sweden | LAGB | — | — | RYGB | — | — | — | 8 | — | — | — |
| Hii et al. [31], Australia | All procedures/LAGB | — | — | All procedures/RYGB | All procedures: 18.4, RYGB: 0.7 | — | — | Equivalent rate to primary surgery | — | — | — |
| Jennings et al. [32], UK | LAGB | — | — | LRYGB | 14.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Langer et al. [14], Austria | LSG | — | — | LRYGB | — | 6.8 | 33 (15–70) | — | — | — | — |
| Magro et al. [8], Brazil | LAGB | 18.8 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Mognol et al. [33], France | LAGB | — | — | LRYGB | — | 9.4 | 42 (7–74) | 14.3 | — | — | — |
| Mller et al. [34], Switzerland | LAGB | — | — | LRYGB, LAGB | LRYGB: 40, reLAGB: 60 of revised LAGB | — | — | — | ReLAGB, LAGB removal-LRYGB, and distal LRYGB | — | ReLAGB: 45 (25 for weight), LAGB removal-LRYGB: 2.2, and distal LRYGB: 20 (13 for weight) |
| Nguyen et al. [35], United States | LAGB | — | — | ReLAGB, LAGB removal | ReLAGB: 0.76, LAGB removal: 0.87 | — | — | 18.8 | — | — | — |
| Patel et al. [36], United States | All procedures (except LAGB) | — | — | All procedures | 2.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Poyck et al. [37], Netherlands | LAGB | — | — | BPD-DS (LRYGB) | — | 17 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Roller and Provost [38], United States | LAGB | — | — | LRYGB | — | 59.5 of LAGB revisions | — | — | 2nd revision: 29.6, multiple revisions: 41.7 | — | — |
| Shimizu et al. [7], United States | RYGB | 10–20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Snyder et al. [11], United States | LAGB/LRYGB | 34/5.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Spivak et al. [39], United States | LAGB | — | — | LRYGB | — | 1.7 | 28.2 (11–46) | — | — | — | — |
| Suter et al. [40], Switzerland | LAGB | — | — | All procedures | 30.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| te Riele et al. [41], Netherlands | LAGB | — | — | LRYGB | 14.1 | 11.4 | 66.2 (12.7–120) | Equivalent rate to primary (29.6 versus 30.9) | revision due to complications, none for weight gain | — | 20 |
| Tucker et al. [13], United States | LAGB | 39 | — | — | Total: 16.5, LAGB removal: 9.1, LAGB removal-LSG: 3.6, and LAGB removal-LRYGB: 2.3 | 7.8 | 21.8 ± 13.9 (4 days–47 months) | 15.2 | 2nd revision/3rd revision/4th and 5th | 13.2 (3 days–44.7 months)/21.2 (12–28.5) | 20/7.5/2.5 |
| Van Dessel et al. [47], Belgium | LSG/LAGB | — | — | LRYGB | — | 100/50 of revisions | 54 | — | — | — | — |
| van Rutte et al. [42], Netherlands | LSG | — | — | LRYGB | 5.5 | — | 18 (10–21) | — | — | — | |
| Van Wageningen et al. [43], Netherlands | LAGB | — | — | LRYGB | 7.6 | 62 | 54 ± 22.8 | Equivalent rate to primary | — | — | — |
| Worni et al. [44], United States | LAGB | — | — | LRYGB | 0.6 | — | — | 3.7 | — | — | — |
| Yazbek et al. [45], Canada | LAGB | — | — | LSG | — | 57.7 of LAGB revisions | — | 5.5 | — | — | — |
| Yimcharoen et al. [12], United States | RYGB | 10–20 | 60–120 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Zagzag et al. [46], United States | LAGB | — | — | All procedures | 1.76 | — | — | — | — | — | — |