Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Med. 2012 Nov 6;78:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.10.023

Table 3.

Adjusted odds ratios from logistic models predicting overweight/obese as a function of ethnicity–nativity, Mexican-origin and white respondents ages 4–24, CHIS (2005, 2007, 2009, N = 25,487).

Outcome: overweight/obese N Ethnicity/nativity
Mexican-origin, generation
US-born non-Hispanic white AOR (se)
1st AOR (se) 2nd AOR (se) 3rd+ (ref. group) AOR (se)
Full sample 25,487 1.10 (0.11) 1.18 (0.12)* 1.00 (–) 0.58 (0.04)**
Child (ages 4–11)
 Female 5678 1.03 (0.37) 1.01 (0.17) 1.00 (–) 0.50 (0.07)**
 Male 6065 1.25 (0.35) 1.12 (0.23) 1.00 (–) 0.50 (0.07)**
Adolescent (ages 12–17)
 Female 4055 0.75 (0.20) 1.01 (0.21) 1.00 (–) 0.36 (0.06)**
 Male 4222 1.15 (0.30) 1.38 (0.30) 1.00 (–) 0.72 (0.11)*
Adult (ages 18–24)
 Female 2672 1.01 (0.22) 1.14 (0.24) 1.00 (–) 0.71 (0.13)
 Male 2795 1.58 (0.32)* 1.72 (0.38)* 1.00 (–) 0.67 (0.12)*

Significantly different from 3+ generation Mexican-origin at

*

p < 0.05,

**

p < 0.01.

CHIS: California Health Interview Survey. Each table row reports adjusted odds ratios from one logistic model. All models control for age in years. Model on full sample also controls for sex. Models are weighted for the CHIS sampling scheme. Reported standard errors (in parentheses) are the standard errors on the log odds multiplied by the odds ratio (exponentiated log odds). Standard errors are computed using jackknife resampling.