Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 13;4:218. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2013.00218

Table 6.

Comparison between the PD subgroup with worsening of speech performance with the PD subgroup with unchanged or amelioration of speech performance under stimulation.

PD group with worse speech performance under stimulation/(n = 8, 6 male)
PD group with unchanged or better speech performance under stimulation/(n = 30, 16 male) Comparison of patients with speech worsening with the group with unchanged/better speech performance, both in the OFF condition
StimOFF condition Median/1.–3. quartile StimON condition Median/1.–3. quartile Comparison OFF vs. ON StimOFF condition Median/1.–3. quartile
UPDRS III 48/40.25–52.75 23.5/13.25–33 p < 0.001 47/31.5–46.25 p = 0.024
UPDRS speech item 1/1–2 1.5/1–2 n.s. 1/1–2 n.s. (p = 0.102)
Perceptual analysis/sum score 6/4.5–7.75 7/7–8.75 p = 0.001 5/3–7 n.s. (p = 0.122)
Voice 1.5/1–2 1.5/1–2 n.s. 1/1–2 n.s.
Articulation 2/1–2 2/2–2 p = 0.033 2/1–2 n.s.
Fluency 2/1–2.75 2.5/1.25–3 n.s. (p = 0.08) 1/1–2 n.s. (p = 0.065)
Prosody 1/1–2 1.5/1–2 n.s. (p = 0.08) 1/0–1 n.s.

Acoustic analysis Mean/SD Mean/SD Mean/SD

Jitter 1.535/1.244 1.560/1.304 n.s. 2.211/2.087 n.s.
Shimmer 8.551/6.256 9.062/7.097 n.s. 11.335/7.483 n.s.
nhR 0.064/0.063 0.061/0.068 n.s. 0.092/0.105 n.s.
Loudness (dB) 71.17/6.70 72.15/4.73 n.s. 69.72/7.83 n.s.
MeanF0 male 124.13/16.90 123.44/15.17 n.s. 117.75/20.09 n.s.
MeanF0 female 168.34/8.05 192.50/0.30 (n.a.) 169.41/45.69 (n.a.)
VAI male 0.681/0.075 0.648/0.065 n.s. 0.648/0.070 n.s.
VAI female 0.704/0.057 0.674/0.154 (n.a.) 0.723/0.063 (n.a.)
Pinw% 8.14/7.72 7.09/7.86 n.s. 17.50/10.56 p = 0.025
NSR 5.46/1.48 5.48/1.61 n.s. 5.26/0.99 n.s.
PR% 19.30/10.07 21.26/7.19 n.s. 16.75/8.87 n.s.
AA 0.95/0.73 0.61/0.63 n.s. 0.19/0.40 p = 0.022
F0SD male 15.94/2.80 14.24/3.93 n.s. 14.30/4.18 n.s.
F0SD female 16.16/1.58 19.60/5.99 (n.a.) 16.85/5.68 (n.a.)

(n.a.): statistical analysis not applicable because of small sample size.