Table 5.
Control liquid I (nonalcoholic) | T_Lag (min) | T ½ (min) | Alcoholic beverages | T_Lag (min) | T ½ (min) | Control liquid II (alcoholic) | T_Lag (min) | T ½ (min) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Isotonic glucose solution, 400 ml | 42 ± 4 | 155 ± 7 | Beer 4.7 %vol, 400 ml | 84 ± 7 a | 206 ± 11 b | 4.7 %vol, 400 ml | 73 ± 6 c | 197 ± 9 d |
Isotonic glucose solution, 200 ml | 30 ± 3 | 144 ± 6 | Red wine 13.7 %vol, 200 ml | 79 ± 7 e | 209 ± 11 f | 13.7 %vol, 200 ml | 76 ± 4 g | 207 ± 9 h |
Isotonic glucose solution, 100 ml | 26 ± 4 | 144 ± 8 | Whisky 43.5 %vol, 100 ml | 86 ± 5 i | 248 ± 16 j | 43.5 %vol, 100 ml | 79 ± 7 k | 242 ± 16 l |
T_Lag lag phase, T ½ gastric half emptying time
Within the particular examination blocks the following differences were found to be statistically significant
Block “Beer”: a p = 0.000136 and c p = 0.000146 in comparison to T_Lag, as well as b p = 0.000368 and d p = 0.00188 in comparison to T ½ of a solid meal after intake of 400 ml of 5 % glucose solution
Block “Wine”: e p = 0.000136 and g p = 0.000146 in comparison to T_Lag, as well as f p = 0.000180 and h p = 0.000207 in comparison to T ½ of a solid meal after intake of 200 ml of 5 % glucose solution
Block “Whisky”: i p = 0.000136 and k p = 0.000136 in comparison to T_Lag, as well as j p = 0.000232 and l p = 0.000350 in comparison to T ½ of a solid meal after intake of 100 ml of 5 % glucose solution