Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 16;65(Suppl 3):485–492. doi: 10.1007/s12070-011-0360-1

Table 1.

Sensitivity and specificity of DW imaging for acquired cholesteatoma: comparison of our study with other groups

Author Cases Technique of DW Sensitivity Specificity NPV PPV
Vercruysse et al. [26] 55 EPI DW 81 100 100 40
Khan et al. [28] 15 EPI DW 83 100
Foer et al. [25] 57 TSE DW 82.6 87.2 96 56.5
Our study 20 TSE DW 92.86 100 100 85

PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value