Skip to main content
. 2013 May 4;472(1):227–231. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3029-0

Table 2.

Outcomes associated with vancomycin or cefazolin for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in total joint arthroplasty

Study Study type Study population Prophylaxis Outcomes
Ritter et al., 1989 [10] Retrospective February to October 1987 TKA, THA Vancomycin + gentamicin No early infections reported
Savarese et al., 1999 [11] Retrospective TKA Vancomycin 2% infection rate
Song et al., 2011 [16] Prospective 2006–2009 TKA Cefazolin 1.06% infection rate
Smith et al., 2012 [15] Retrospective, 2006–2010 TKA, THA Switch from cefazolin to vancomycin in 2008 ↓ PJI from 1.0% to 0.5% (p = 0.03) ↓ MRSA PJI from 0.23% to 0.07% (p = 0.14)
Sewick et al., 2012 [13] Retrospective, 2008–2010 TKA, THA Cefazolin or cefazolin + vancomycin No difference in overall infection rates (1.4% versus 1.1%, p = 0.64) or by THA and TKA subgroups Higher rate of MRSA in cefazolin (0.008%) versus cefazolin + vancomycin (0.002%; p = 0.02)

PJI = periprosthetic joint infection; MRSA = methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.