Table 2.
Outcomes associated with vancomycin or cefazolin for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in total joint arthroplasty
| Study | Study type | Study population | Prophylaxis | Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ritter et al., 1989 [10] | Retrospective February to October 1987 | TKA, THA | Vancomycin + gentamicin | No early infections reported |
| Savarese et al., 1999 [11] | Retrospective | TKA | Vancomycin | 2% infection rate |
| Song et al., 2011 [16] | Prospective 2006–2009 | TKA | Cefazolin | 1.06% infection rate |
| Smith et al., 2012 [15] | Retrospective, 2006–2010 | TKA, THA | Switch from cefazolin to vancomycin in 2008 | ↓ PJI from 1.0% to 0.5% (p = 0.03) ↓ MRSA PJI from 0.23% to 0.07% (p = 0.14) |
| Sewick et al., 2012 [13] | Retrospective, 2008–2010 | TKA, THA | Cefazolin or cefazolin + vancomycin | No difference in overall infection rates (1.4% versus 1.1%, p = 0.64) or by THA and TKA subgroups Higher rate of MRSA in cefazolin (0.008%) versus cefazolin + vancomycin (0.002%; p = 0.02) |
PJI = periprosthetic joint infection; MRSA = methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.