Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov;51(11):3720–3725. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01981-13

Table 2.

Number and percent of results in agreement, disagreement, or undetected using the molecular method compared to the corresponding physician-ordered automated blood culture resulta

Primer grouping Total nb Agreement
Disagreement
Not detected
n % n % n %
Staphylococcus spp.c 51 50 98.0 1d 0.0 0 2.0
Streptococcus spp.e 28 27 96.4 1f 3.6 0 0.0
Enteric GNRsg,h 15 11 73.3 0 0.0 4i 26.7
Universal onlyj 6 4 66.7 0 0.0 2 33.3
All 100 92 92 2 2.0 6 6.0
a

Numbers and percentages of the 100 isolates detected by PCR/pyrosequencing using a target-specific and/or universal primer set(s). Purified isolates were available for all 8 discordant samples; DNA extracts were analyzed using PCR/pyrosequencing, and all isolates were correctly identified using both the universal and target-specific primer sets (data not shown).

b

n, number of isolates.

c

Results for correct identification of Staphylococcus spp. are as follows: S. aureus (including both methicillin-sensitive S. aureus [MSSA] and methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA]), 18/19 isolates (94.7%); CoNS, 32/32 isolates (100%).

d

While the universal primer set correctly classified the organism as a Staphylococcus sp., the DNA sequences generated using the Staphylococcus-specific primers failed to match any known sequence in our library or the GenBank database.

e

Results for correct identification of Streptococcus and Enterococcus spp. (n = 28) are as follows: GAS, 2/2 isolates (100%); GBS, 2/2 isolates (100%); GCS, 2/2 isolates (100%); GGS, 3/4 isolates (75%); Enterococcus spp., 8/8 isolates (100%); S. pneumoniae, 5/5 isolates (100%); viridans group streptococci, 5/5 isolates (100%).

f

Culture-based identification was GGS. While the universal primer set correctly classified the organism as a Streptococcus sp., the Streptococcus-specific primer set identified the organism as GCS. The difference in classification between GGS and GCS was a single base in the 233-bp region of the Streptococcus-specific 23S rRNA gene target being amplified.

g

GNRs, Gram-negative rods.

h

Results for correct identification of enteric GNRs (n = 15) are as follows: E. coli, 6/8 isolates (75%); Enterobacter/Citrobacter spp., 2/2 isolates (100%); S. marcescens, 1/1 isolate (100%); Salmonella sp., 1/1 isolate (100%); P. rettgeri, 1/1 isolate (100%); P. mirabilis, 0/1 isolate (0%); K. pneumoniae, 0/1 isolate (0%).

i

PCR/pyrosequencing reactions from both the universal primers and the enteric GNR primers failed to detect 2 E. coli isolates and 1 isolate each of P. mirabilis and K. pneumoniae.

j

Results for correct identification using the universal target only (n = 6) are as follows: P. aeruginosa, 3/4 isolates (75%); Bacillus sp., 1/1 isolate (100%); S. maltophilia: 0/1 isolate (0%).