Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 29;38(1):39–46. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2110-3

Table 1.

Revisions due to implant fractures in datasets of National Arthroplasty Registers

Register Data source Data collection Follow-up (years) N Primary THA N Revisions N Implant fractures % Implant fractures at all revisions % Implant fractures of all primary THA Failure rate per 100,000 observed component years Factor difference to mean
Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register Annual Report 2006 1979–2006 27 296,015 25,984 407 1.57 0.14 10 0.38
New Zealand Orthopaedic Ass. - National Joint Registry Eight-year Report 1999–2006 7 42,092 1,034 8 0.77 0.02 5 0.20
Australian Orthopaedic Association - National Joint Registry Annual Report 2007 1999–2006 7 160,349 23,261 700 3.00 0.44 12.5 4.66
Finnish Arthroplasty Register The 2006 Implant Yearbook on Orthopaedic Endoprostheses 1997–2006 10 65,062 13,113 262 2.00 0.40 8.1 3.01
Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register Annual Report 2006 1995–2005 11 75,304 10,381 512 4.93 0.68 12.4 4.62
National Joint Registry for England and Wales 4th Annual Report 2006 1 55,052 5,296 201 3.80 0.37
Canadian Joint Replacement Registry (CJRR) Annual Report 2007 2003–2006 4 39,162 3,464 137 4.00 0.35
Total/average 7.57 733,036 82,533 2,227 2.70 0.30 27