Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 14;472(2):665–673. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3127-z

Table 3.

Comparison of acetabular version, acetabular osseous support to the femoral head, coxa valga, and femoral version based on 2-D CT scans

Variable CMTHD group
(n = 19 hips)
DDH group
(n = 45 hips)
p value
Acetabular version (°)*
 Level I 14 (−60 to 27) 2 (−13 to 15) < 0.001
 Level II 18 (−7 to 32) 7 (−15 to 24) < 0.001
 Level III 22 (−7 to 31) 12 (−7 to 31) < 0.001
 Level IV 24 (−1 to 35) 16 (−8 to 31) 0.001
 Level V 24 (3–35) 19 (−2 to 32) 0.043
Anterior acetabular sector angle (°)* 30 (10–56) 51 (22–92) < 0.001
Posterior acetabular sector angle (°)* 80 (56–102) 87 (72–100) 0.007
Coxa valga (femoral neck-shaft angle) (°) 156 (141–175) 148 (130–168) < 0.001
Femoral version (°)* 28 (7–47) 22 (−21 to 46) 0.104

Values are expressed as mean, with range in parentheses; * measurement based on axial 2-D CT scans; measurement based on coronal 2-D CT scans; 2-D = two-dimensional; CMTHD = Charcot-Marie-Tooth hip dysplasia; DDH = developmental dysplasia of the hip.