Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 30;472(2):543–554. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3199-9

Table 4.

Demographics, wear, histology, MRI, and intraoperative data for hip resurfacings and THAs presenting with unexplained pain

Variable Hip resurfacing THA p value
Number of hips 10 24
Age (years)* 49 (33–60) 54 (42–66) 0.32
BMI (kg/m2)* 24 (22–37) 27 (19–40) 0.48
Male:female 3:7 15:9 0.13
Time to revision (months)* 23 (18–50) 45 (18–103) 0.01
Head size (mm)* 45 (40–54) 46 (38–53) 0.90
Acetabular inclination (°)* 47 (33–51) 46 (33–51) 0.56
Acetabular anteversion (°)* 16 (7–21) 20 (5–25) 0.14
Implant type 0.15
 ASR (DePuy, Warsaw, IN, USA) 1 (10) 12 (48)
 BHR (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA) 7 (70) 8 (32)
 Conserve Plus (Wright Medical, Memphis, TN, USA) 1 (10) 2 (8)
 Cormet (Corin Group, Cirencester, UK) 0 (0) 1 (4)
 Durom (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN, USA) 0 (0) 1 (4)
 M2a (Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA) 1 (10) 1 (4)
TLWR (μm/year)* 3.3 (0–128.2) 2.2 (0–85.6) 0.45
TVWR (mm3/year)* 0.3 (0–26.2) 0.3 (0–29.3) 0.83
ALVAL score* 6 (3–10) 7 (2–10) 0.45
Metallic particles (Grade 2–3) 2 (20) 2 (8) 0.56
Tissue damage score (Grade 2–3) 6 (60) 17 (68) 0.71
MRI synovial volume (mm3)* 13,917 (0–198,100) 24,663 (0–645,575) 0.25
MRI synovial thickness (mm)* 8 (1–29) 9 (1–45) 0.82

* Values are expressed as median, with range in parentheses; values are expressed as number, with percentage in parentheses; BMI = body mass index; ASR = Articular Surface Replacement; BHR = Birmingham Hip Resurfacing.