Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 13;9(1):e85669. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085669

Table 2. SELDI profiles of plasma from CRTL, RIPC 5′ and RIPC 10′ rats.

Protein name Molecular mass (Da) CTRL(n = 10) RIPC 5′ (n = 10) RIPC 10′ (n = 10) Statistical analysis# Peaks*m/z (Da) Accession number
Apolipoprotein C-III 11117 4.98±2.41 3.43±1.40 2.89±0.79 CRTL vs RIPC 10′ (p = 0.02) 8317 P06759
Haptoglobin alpha chain 9317 8.53±1.28 9.38±1.68 9.50±0.66 CRTL vs RIPC 5′ vs RIPC 10′ (p = 0.056) 9420 P00738
Transthyretin (monomeric form) 15720 1.77±0.37 1.59±0.27 1.87±0.31 CRTL vs RIPC 10′ (p = 0.059) 13720 P02767
0.55±0.31 0.64±0.35 0.40±0.17 RIPC 5′ vs RIPC 10′ (p = 0.059) 15870
Hemoglobin beta chain 15979 0.87±0.52 0.93±0.46 0.62±0.27 RIPC 5′ vs RIPC 10′ (p = 0.059) 15980 P02091
Transthyretin(dimeric form) 31440 70.09±4.67 66.36±4.81 66.12±5.81 CRTL vs RIPC 10′ (p = 0.028)CRTL vs RIPC 5′ vs RIPC 10′ (p = 0.066) 27340 P02767
1.61±0.24 1.69±0.29 1.41±0.21 RIPC 5′ vs RIPC 10′ (p = 0.049) 42427
Apolipoprotein A-IV 44456 0.39±0.12 0.33±0.06 0.30±0.08 CRTL vs RIPC 10′ (p = 0.059) 42463 P02651
1.02±0.14 1.06±0.17 0.89±0.13 RIPC 5′ vs RIPC 10′ (p = 0.059) 42610 P
Fibrinogen beta chain 50671 6.46±0.86 7.09±1.47 6.23±1.07 RIPC 5′ vs RIPC 10′ (p = 0.028)CRTL vs RIPC 5′ vs RIPC 10′ (p = 0.071) 54700 P14480

only the peaks with protein identification validated are listed.

# Mann-whitney test was used to compare 2 groups and Kruskal-Wallis test for the 3 groups.