Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 1;13:272. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-13-272

Table 1.

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for E. coli containing the indicated plasmids

Drug resistant plasmid Name Antimicrobial drug Drug resistance plasmid MIC (ug/ml) Empty vector MIC (ug/ml) Fold increase
pAMP
ampicillin
16
4
4
pAMP
piperacillin
3
2
1.5
pAMP
cefotaxime
<.25
<.25
0
pAMP
ceftazidime
<.5
<.5
0
pAMP
cefepime
0.064
0.094
0.68
pAMP
Aztreonam
0.19
0.125
1.5
pAMP
Imipenem
0.25
0.25
0
pCIP
ciprofloxacin
0.125
<0.002
>62.5
pCIP
levofloxacin
0.38
0.012
31.7
pCIP
Ampicillin
6
4
1.5
pCIP
piperacillin
3
2
1.5
pCIP
ceftazidime
<.5
<.5
0
pCIP
cefotaxime
<.25
<.25
0
pCIP
cefepime
0.125
0.094
1.3
pCIP
Imipenem
0.25
0.25
0
pTMP
trimethoprim
>32
0.124
>258
pTMP
trimethoprim- sulfamethoxazole
0.5
0.064
7.8
pAZT
Aztreonam
12
0.125
96
pAZT
cefepime
1
0.094
10.6
pAZT
ceftazidime
16
0.5
32
pAZT
piperacillin
12
2
6
pSXT
trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
1
0.064
15.6
pSXT
trimethoprim
>32
0.125
>256
pPRP:1B
ciprofloxacin
0.125
0.016
7.8
pPRP:1B levofloxacin 0.25 0.047 5.3

MICs in the presence of the plasmid with the metagenomic DNA insert compared to the empty vector (pSMART or 1B) are shown. In accordance with manufactures recommendations, less than a 4-fold increase was considered to be within the margin of error.