Table 2.

Standardized factor loadings for confirmatory factor analytic models 4 and 5 (n=34,386^a NESARC wave 2 participants)

Item	Model 4: One PDD factor with adjustment for method effects		Model 5: Two PDD factors with adjustment for method effects
	Perceived Devaluation-Discrimination	Latent Method Factor	Perceived Devaluation*	Perceived Discrimination*	Latent Method Factor
Devaluation1	0.385	0.659	0.395		0.658
Devaluation2	0.430	0.721	0.439		0.728
Devaluation3	0.493		0.506
Devaluation4	0.657		0.676
Devaluation5	0.697		0.720
Discrimination1	0.310	0.580		0.316	0.581
Discrimination2	0.472	0.545		0.482	0.550
Discrimination3	0.548			0.564
Discrimination4	0.480	0.317		0.496	0.313
Discrimination5	0.578			0.595
Discrimination6	0.469	0.312		0.483	0.309
Discrimination7	0.387			0.395

Parameters from WLSMV-estimated models are displayed.

^a267 participants were excluded due to missing data on all items of the stigma scale. All freely-estimated parameters were significant at p<.001.

PDD=perceived devaluation-discrimination.

^*The correlation between the perceived devaluation and perceived discrimination factor was r=0.901. Global model fit for Model 4 was CFI=0.958, TLI=0.942, RMSEA=0.056. For Model 5, CFI=0.962, TLI=0.946, RMSEA=0.054.