Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 5.
Published in final edited form as: Vaccine. 2013 Oct 19;31(50):5960–5967. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.10.036

Table 1.

Comparison of orthologs of Ehrlichia muris P29 protein

Organism /strain Length (aa) Similarity
Index (%)a
Repeatsb Percent of
protein in
repeats (%)d
pIe GenBank
Accession
Number

No Length (aa)

E. muris P29 228 - None - 0 4.22 KC595883

E. muris-like agent P29 252 62.4 None - 0 4.26 K523728

E. chaffeensis TRP47
  Arkansas 316 53.5 7 19 42.08 4.03 DQ085430.1
  Sapulpa 328 56.7 4.5 33 40.24 4.04 DQ085431.1

E. canis TRP36
  Jake 279 41.7 12.2 9 38.70 3.93 DQ085427.1
  Oklahoma 218 39.3 5.2 9 20.64 4.26 DQ085428.1

E. ruminantium mucin-like protein
  Gardel 530 29.9 16.9c 22 66.41 3.75 CR925677
  Welgevonden 625 29 51.8c 9 73.44 4.19 CR925678.1
a

Similarity index was calculated following pairwise alignment of E.muris P29 protein sequences with or thologs in other ehlichial genomes by the Lipman-Pearson method using the MegAlign program (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, WI)

b

Tandem Repeats Finder program was used to identify the tandem repeats in the sequences

c

Short four-amino acid tandem repeats of less than three numbers present in these sequences are not included in the analysis

d

Proportion of protein in repeats expressed in percent

e

Calculated isoelectric point (pI)