Table 2. Adaptive iterative reviewing: IED nominations are iteratively presented to the reviewer one-by-one using 10 events per iteration.

Subject	#IEDs	IEDs confirmed up and until iteration
		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15
S1	13	8	11	13	13	13	13	13	13	13	13	13	13	13	13	13
S2	11	4	6	6	8	8	8	8	8	9	9	9	9	9	9	9
S3	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5
S4	36	4	8	14	17	20	24	27	29	30	31	32	32	33	33	35
S5	19	8	12	15	18	19	19	19	19	19	19	19	19	19	19	19
S6	6	4	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	6	6	6
S7	79	9	17	26	36	45	52	58	61	62	68	68	70	72	74	74
S8	5	3	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	5	5	5	5
S9	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
S10	12	3	10	11	11	12	12	12	12	12	12	12	12	12	12	12
S11	7	1	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
S12	7	3	4	5	6	6	6	7	7	7	7	7	7	7	7	7
S13	19	10	17	19	19	19	19	19	19	19	19	19	19	19	19	19
S14	14	9	12	12	12	13	14	14	14	14	14	14	14	14	14	14
S15	6	5	5	5	6	6	6	6	6	6	6	6	6	6	6	6
TOTAL	241	78	120	144	164	179	191	201	206	209	216	217	220	224	226	228
MEAN		32%	50%	60%	68%	74%	79%	83%	85%	87%	90%	90%	91%	93%	94%	95%

Nomination certainties are updated after every iteration, thereby allowing nominations with higher likelihoods to be shown first. Template reliabilities were also updated at the end of each review. This was done by updating the true and false positives of contributing templates and recalculating their reliability scores accordingly, as shown in Appendix S1.