Table 3. Power (%) of the ADA method with two sets of candidate P-value truncation thresholds.

candidate P-value truncation thresholds	Given PAR = 0.3% and d = 20					Given d = 20 and risk = 80%						Given risk = 80% and PAR = 0.3%
	risk (%)					PAR (%)						d
	5	20	50	80	100	0.0	0.1	0.2	0.3	0.4	0.5	3	5	10	15	20
Nominal significance level = 5%
0.10, 0.11,… 0.20	29.97	23.17	33.28	67.41	88.24	4.84	18.45	45.06	67.41	82.03	90.47	14.00	24.16	40.58	55.80	67.41
0.05, 0.06,…, 0.25	29.38	23.50	35.04	68.73	89.31	5.04	18.56	46.09	68.73	83.60	91.91	14.64	25.50	42.24	57.30	68.73
Nominal significance level = 1%
0.10, 0.11,…, 0.20	13.00	8.17	17.99	51.10	78.32	1.00	8.39	29.50	51.10	68.09	80.03	4.68	10.99	24.01	38.65	51.10
0.05, 0.06,…, 0.25	12.25	8.22	18.74	51.98	79.17	0.93	8.46	30.03	51.98	69.45	81.22	4.88	11.50	24.93	39.59	51.98