Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 10;1:22. doi: 10.1186/2051-5960-1-22

Table 1.

Previous studies

Author and year Tumour type Cut off value for IHC Low MGMT protein expression predictive of:
MGMT IHC compared to molecular gold standard Molecular test Correlation between IHC and molecular test
Progression free survival (PFS) Overall survival (OS)
Nakasu et al. 2004 [7]
69 high-grade gliomas (grades III and IV)
10%
-
Yes
No
-
-
Brell et al. 2005 [11]
93 anaplastic gliomas: 75 AAs and 18 with oligodendroglial component
5%
No
Yes
Yes
MS-PCR
No
Chinot et al. 2007 [21]
28 GBMs
35%
Yes
Yes
No
-
-
Capper et al. 2008 [22]
75 primary GBMs
15%
Yes – median survival
No
-
-
Preusser et al. 2008 [6]
164 GBMs
10%
-
No
Yes
MS-PCR
Poor agreement
Rodriguez et al. 2008 [23]
50 GBMs
10%
No
No
Yes
MS-PCR
No
Karayan-Tapon et al. 2010 [24]
81 GBMs
15%
No
No
Yes
MS-PCR
-
SQ-PCR
No
Pyrosequencing
Yes
Q-RT-PCR
Yes
Quillien et al. 2012 [5] 100 GBMs 23% Yes Yes No - -

The table shows previous studies where MGMT IHC has been performed. The cut-off value was the percentage of MGMT-positive tumour cell nuclei (assessed by eye). The correlation of IHC with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and comparison with a molecular gold standard (where applied) are also shown.

Abbreviations: AA anaplastic astrocytoma, GBM glioblastoma multiforme, MS-PCR methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction, Q-RT-PCR quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, SQ-PCR semi-quantitative polymerase chain reaction.