. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Nutr Biochem. 2013 Mar 22;24(9):1580–1586. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2013.01.008

Table 3.

PCR Array results

DNA Response Element	Gene	Name	Fold Regulation by Salt	Fold Regulation by Grape

			HS (v LS)	LSG (v LS)	HSG (v HS)
	AhR	Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor	−1.389^*	1.206^*	1.244^*
	ARNT	AhR Nuclear Translocator	−2.437^*	1.042	1.922^*
XRE	Nrf2	nuclear factor erythroid-derived 2	1.095	1.285^*	1.568^*
XRE	CYPA1	Cytochrome P450 1A1	−2.692^*	1.955^*	1.329^*
XRE	CYPB1	Cytochrome P450 1B1	−1.496^*	1.226	1.522^*
XRE/ARE	GST M2	Glutathione S-Transferase mu 2	−1.726^*	1.252^*	1.348^*
XRE/ARE	GST M3	Glutathione S-Transferase mu 3	−2.495^*	1.232^*	1.417^*
XRE/ARE	UGT1A6	UDP-glucuronosyltransferase1A6	−1.284^*	1.173	1.126
ARE	GST A1	Glutathione S-Transferase A1	−1.115	1.002	1.036
ARE	GCS	γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase	−1.422^*	2.965^*	5.617^*
ARE	GR	Glutathione Reductase	−2.220^*	1.152	1.967^*
ARE	GPx3	Glutathione Peroxidase 3	−1.318^*	1.056	1.309^*
ARE	GPx4	Glutathione Peroxidase 4	1.057	−1.182	−1.144

N = 4 per group. Pair-wise comparison via ΔΔCT method.

p at least < 0.05 versus respective control (LS or HS) (LS) low-salt diet; (LSG) low salt +grape powder diet; (HS) high-salt diet; (HSG) high salt + grape powder diet.