Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 31;2013:786409. doi: 10.1155/2013/786409

Table 3.

Risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the association of SGA and LGA with dietary pattern indices.

SGA (n = 71) LGA (n = 82)
Estimate (95% CI) Estimate (95% CI)
Model with AHEI-P a
n (number of obs. used) 755 775
AHEI-P
 T2 (53–62) versus T1 (33–52) 0.73 (0.41, 1.31) 0.74 (0.43, 1.26)
 T3 (63–98) versus T1 (33–52) 0.93 (0.49, 1.75) 0.92 (0.50, 1.69)
Maternal age 0.95 (0.90, 1.01) 0.99 (0.96, 1.03)
Nonwhite versus White 3.16 (1.97, 5.06) 0.43 (0.16, 1.15)
Education
 Some college versus ≤HS 1.29 (0.68, 2.43) 1.15 (0.61, 2.20)
 Associate or BA versus ≤HS 0.71 (0.30, 1.68) 1.62 (0.81, 3.23)
 Master or more versus ≤HS 1.03 (0.35, 3.08) 1.39 (0.57, 3.37)
Poverty index ratio
  (185 to 350%) versus (<185%) 1.16 (0.63, 2.12) 1.18 (0.70, 1.97)
  (≥350%) versus (<185%) 1.83 (0.91, 3.65) 0.89 (0.45, 1.73)
Smoked, yes versus no 2.92 (1.58, 5.39) 0.76 (0.29, 1.97)
Alcohol, g 0.97 (0.82, 1.15) 0.47 (0.10, 2.13)
Total energy 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) 1.00 (1.00, 1.00)
Prepregnancy BMI, kg/m2 0.98 (0.94, 1.02) 1.06 (1.03, 1.09)
Model with aMED a
T2 (4-5) versus T1 (0–3) 0.75 (0.44, 1.29) 0.71 (0.44, 1.14)
T3 (6–8) versus T1 (0–3) 0.94 (0.48, 1.81) 0.71 (0.37, 1.35)
Model with GI a
T1 (35–48) versus T3 (52–63) 0.86 (0.49, 1.49) 1.03 (0.60, 1.75)
T2 (49–51) versus T3 (52–63) 0.87 (0.50, 1.50) 1.26 (0.77, 2.08)
Model with GL a
T1 (38–107) versus T3 (153–520) 0.92 (0.35, 2.40) 1.18 (0.50, 2.78)
T2 (108–152) versus T3 (153–520) 1.13 (0.53, 2.37) 1.10 (0.56, 2.17)

aAdjusted for total energy intake, race, education, age, poverty index ratio, smoking, alcohol, and pre-pregnancy BMI.