Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 3.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2013 Oct 15;53(1):184–188. doi: 10.1002/anie.201306282

Figure 4.

Figure 4

a–d) AR-PAM coronal MAP images taken from the same PLGA inverse opal scaffold implanted in the ear of a nude mouse at weeks 0, 1, 3, and 6 post implantation, respectively. The arrowheads indicate small pieces of the scaffold that likely came off during the surgery, and their slight changes in position and orientation relative to the main scaffold at different time points could be attributed to the activity of the mouse. Scale bars: 2 mm. e) Comparison of the degradation profiles of scaffolds as a function of time obtained from the same scaffold using PAM and from different scaffolds using the conventional invasive mass loss assay. f–i) Co-registered 3D reconstruction images showing both the degradation of a scaffold (the same piece) and the remodeling of vasculature simultaneously. Scale bars: 2 mm. j–m) Co-registered B-scan images at the dotted planes as indicated in (f–i), respectively. The blood vessels observed at week 0 were mainly located on the top surface of the scaffold. Scale bars: 1 mm. MAP stands for “maximum amplitude projection”.