Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 13.
Published in final edited form as: Vaccine. 2013 Jul 16;32(23):2756–2762. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.07.010

Table 2.

Vaccine efficacy evaluation with respect to viremia

Group No. dams, (N) Viremia positive dams
Viremia negative dams
% viremia+ (100 x nv+/N) Odds ratio (exact 95% CI) VE, % p-value
No. (nv+) GM, 105 CMV DNA copies/mL Litters
No. Litters
All live pups (≥1 CMV+ pup) ≥1 dead pup (≥1 CMV+ pup) All live pups (≥1 CMV+ pup) ≥1 dead pup (≥1 CMV+ pup)
control 14 13 6.8 5 (1) 8 (8) 1 0 (0) 1 (1) 93 - - -

gB/FA 10 7 0.9 3 (3) 4 (4) 3 2 (1) 1 (1) 70 0.180 (0.016–2.064) 25 0.272

gB/AS02V 10 3 1.7 2 (2) 1 (1) 7 5 (5) 2 (1) 30 0.033 (0.0007–0.478) 68 0.002a

gB/AS01B 9 1 0.9 0 (0) 1 (1) 8 5 (4) 3 (2) 11 0.0096 (0.0002–0.235) 88 <0.001a
a

Significantly different from control (Fisher exact test with a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, such that α=0.05/3=0.017).

No., number. N, total number of dams/group; nv+, number of viremia-positive dams/group; nv−, number of viremia-negative dams/group, ≥1 CMV+ pup, at least one CMV-positive pup/litter/group; viremia+, viremia-positive; GM, geometric mean; CI, confidence interval;. VE, vaccine efficacy.