Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 6;39(1):74–83. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jst067

Table III.

Unstandardized Results for Significant Bidirectional Regression Models Between Maternal-Report DSMP and Paternal-Report DADS-Amount Scores

Independent Variables DSMP (M) slope
DADS-A (P) slope
Est. 95% CI p Est. 95% CI p
Baseline covariates
    Site 13 −0.036 −0.257, 0.185 .75 3.56 −0.76, 7.88 .11
    Site 12 −0.073 −0.193, 0.047 .23 −1.96 −4.28, 0.36 .10
    Primary caregiver education −0.064 −0.152, 0.024 .16 −0.50 −2.20, 1.19 .56
    Household composition −0.039 −0.247, 0.169 .71 5.49 1.67, 9.31 .005
    Tanner stage 0.025 −0.036, 0.086 .43 1.23 0.04, 2.42 .04
    Gender −0.059 −0.153, 0.035 .22 −0.24 −2.05, 1.56 .79
    Race 0.055 −0.082, 0.192 .43 3.49 −6.28, −0.70 .01
    Age 0.004 −0.051, 0.059 .88 −0.44 −1.50, 0.63 .42
    Diabetes duration 0.003 −0.017, 0.023 .75 −0.14 −0.51, 0.23 .47
    Insulin regimen −0.088 −0.196, 0.020 .11 2.33 0.19, 4.47 .03
Predictor variables
    DSMP (M) intercept 0.004 −0.006, 0.014 .46 −0.15 −0.296, −0.002 <.05
    DADS-A (P) intercept −0.001 −0.005, 0.003 .74 .02 −0.049, 0.093 .55

Note. Significant results (p < 0.05) in bold.

Est. = unstandardized estimate; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval; DADS-A (P) = DADS-Amount (paternal report); DSMP(Y) = Diabetes Self-Management Profile (youth report); DSMP (M) = Diabetes Self-Management Profile (maternal report); Site 12 = Cincinnati versus Wilmington site; Site 13 = Cincinnati versus Miami site.