Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 6;39(1):74–83. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jst067

Table IV.

Unstandardized Results for Significant Bidirectional Regression Models Between Maternal-Report DSMP and Maternal-Report DADS-Helpfulness Scores

Independent Variables DSMP (M) Slope
DADS-H (M) Slope
Est. 95% CI p Est. 95% CI p
Baseline covariates
    Site 13 −0.012 −0.239, 0.215 .92 −2.95 −7.36, 1.46 .19
    Site 12 −0.087 −0.210, 0.036 .16 2.16 −0.21, 4.53 .08
    Primary caregiver education −0.069 −0.159, 0.021 .13 −0.09 −1.82, 1.64 .92
    Household composition 0.041 −0.182, 0.264 .72 −0.45 −4.80, 3.90 .84
    Tanner stage 0.019 −0.044, 0.082 .56 0.81 −0.42, 2.04 .20
    Gender −0.077 −0.175, 0.021 .12 0.39 −1.51, 2.29 .69
    Race 0.065 −0.074, 0.204 .36 −0.18 −2.86, 2.50 .90
    Age 0.004 −0.053, 0.061 .88 −0.06 −1.16, 1.04 .92
    Diabetes duration 0.002 −0.018, 0.022 .85 0.02 −0.35, 0.39 .91
    Insulin regimen −0.082 −0.188, 0.024 .13 0.37 −1.70, 2.44 .73
Predictor variables:
    DSMP (M) intercept 0.007 −0.005, 0.019 .22 −0.16 −0.35, 0.03 .10
    DADS-H (M) intercept −0.005 −0.009, −0.001 .02 −0.03 −0.22, 0.16 .47

Note. Significant results (p < 0.05) in bold.

Est. = unstandardized estimate; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval; DADS-H (M) = DADS-Helpfulness (maternal report); DSMP (M) = Diabetes Self-Management Profile (maternal report); Site 12 = Cincinnati versus Wilmington site; Site 13 = Cincinnati versus Miami site.