Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 17;19(1):016014. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.19.1.016014

Table 2.

Comparison of measurements between instruments with the same platform.

  Lateral width
CFT
1 mm right PFT
1 mm left PFT
Mean (SD) μm COV ANOVA p value Mean (SD) μm COV ANOVA p value Mean (SD) μm COV ANOVA p value Mean (SD) μm COV ANOVA p value
Zeiss Cirrus™
Instrument 1 5171 (15) 0.286 0.034 187 (3) 1.559 <0.001 307 (4) 1.163 <0.001 316 (3) 1.120 0.037
Instrument 2 5180 (14) 0.269 196 (3) 1.640 315 (4) 1.174 314 (3) 1.059
All instruments 5176 (14)     191 (3)     311 (4)     315 (3)    
Difference, %
0.16
 
 
5.24
 
 
2.25
 
 
0.63
 
 
Heidelberg Spectralis™
Instrument 1 5273 (65) 1.223 0.002 184 (3) 1.332 <0.001 312 (3) 0.920 0.004 308 (2) 0.775 <0.001
Instrument 2 5290 (69) 1.309 188 (3) 1.513 315 (3) 0.904 312 (3) 0.991
All instruments 5282 (67)     186 (3)     314 (3)     310 (3)    
Difference, %
0.32
 
 
2.12
 
 
0.88
 
 
1.08
 
 
Bioptigen Envisu™
Instrument 1 5215 (12) 0.236 0.002 180 (2) 0.857 <0.001 302 (2) 0.755 <0.001 300 (3) 0.983 <0.001
Instrument 2 5230 (15) 0.282 183 (3) 1.536 311 (3) 0.836 305 (3) 0.493
All instruments 5222 (14)     181 (2)     306 (3)     303 (2)    
Difference, %
0.27
 
 
1.79
 
 
2.12
 
 
1.65
 
 
Bioptigen SDOIS
Instrument 1 5209 (26) 0.489 0.042 162 (2) 1.210 0.029 269 (3) 1.013 0.016 268 (3) 1.198 0.029
Instrument 2 5205 (29) 0.559 163 (2) 1.648 267 (3) 1.219 273 (3) 1.220
All instruments 5207 (27)     162 (2)     268 (3)     270 (3)    
Difference, % 0.08     0.64     0.65     2.05    

Note: CFT, central foveal thickness; PFT, parafoveal thickness; SD, standard deviation; COV, coefficient of variance; ANOVA, analysis of variance.