Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 17.
Published in final edited form as: Horm Behav. 2010 Dec 30;59(5):780–792. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.12.004

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The distribution of CUMD measures in the Bonaparte (Narjani, 1924) and Landis (Landis, Landis, and Bowles, 1940) samples. The Bonaparte sample (N=43) had significantly shorter CUMDs than did the Landis sample (N=35) possibly reflecting a difference in the clitoral measuring point used in the two studies.