Table 4. T/N ratios before, during and after AT-II infusion, and T/N ratio improvement factors in patients with hepatic malignancies.
Author (year) | T/N ratiopre-infusion | T/N ratio during infusion | T/N ratio post-infusion | T/N improvement factor |
Sasaki et al. [25] | median 1.36 | - | median 4.05 | median 3.07 (1.46–5.33) |
(1985) | (0.38–3.36) | (1.56–9.33) | p<0.001 | |
Goldberg et al. 1 [33] | median 0.36 | - | median 0.75 | median 2.80 (0.80–11.70) |
(1991) | (0.11–0.90) | (0.10–8.11) | p<0.05 | |
Goldberg et al. 2 [34] | median 3.4 | - | median 7.3 | median 1.8 (0.5–3.4) |
(1991) | (1.3–6.0) | (1.5–8.8) | p<0.05 | |
Burke et al. [19] | median 1.3 | median 2.1 | median 1.85 | NR |
(2001) | (0.93–6.21) | (0.63–22.86) | (0.70–18.34) | p = 0.008 and p = 0.03* |
Ishikawa et al. [36] | median 1.03 | - | median 1.34 | NR |
(2007) | (0.41–1.72) | (0.84–2.09) | p = 0.01 |
T/N ratios are described as median (range). P-values correspond to reported significance levels of Wilcoxon test for paired data. *The first p-value refers to the improvement of T/N ratio during infusion and the last to post-infusion. Abbreviations: NR = Not Reported.