Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 19;179(3):344–352. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt279

Table 1.

Weekly Diarrhea Incidence and Rainfall in 19 Villages in Rural Coastal Ecuador, February 18, 2004–April 18, 2007

Villagea Duration of Surveillance, weeks Population Meanb (SD) Diarrhea Incidencec No. of Heavy Rainfall Eventsd Annual Rainfall, mme Remotenessf
1 161 42 (5) 3.57 10 2,759 0.20
2 161 105 (19) 4.95 10 2,861 0.20
3 152 195 (37) 7.55 12 3,122 0.06
4 154 297 (116) 4.20 20 3,524 0.13
5 162 511 (124) 2.81 15 3,222 0.07
7 155 69 (9) 3.84 20 3,564 0.25
8 140 116 (34) 6.45 20 3,548 0.20
9 157 203 (55) 4.21 20 3,826 0.77
10 136 109 (19) 2.16 20 3,656 0.62
11 148 203 (25) 1.83 25 4,133 0.78
12 90 33 (12) 11.57 10 2,800 0.11
13 134 70 (20) 6.73 12 2,933 0.31
15 134 63 (6) 2.24 12 3,014 0.40
16 163 71 (17) 5.27 13 3,199 0.71
17 139 233 (102) 3.71 14 3,305 0.96
18 135 89 (19) 6.36 17 3,369 0.57
19 159 221 (72) 3.01 19 3,587 0.83
20 150 73 (25) 1.91 19 3,431 0.80
21 156 112 (14) 7.52 27 4,607 1.00

Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.

a Villages 6 and 14 were excluded from this analysis because of the poor quality of diarrhea surveillance in these villages.

b Mean number of people captured by active surveillance each week.

c Per 1,000 person-weeks.

d Number of weeks (out of 165) in which the maximum 24-hour rainfall exceeded the 90th percentile value, 56 mm.

e Mean annual rainfall, calculated for three 52-week periods from February 2004 to February 2007.

f A measure of the cost and duration of travel to the nearest city, scaled so that the most remote village had a value of 1.