Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 10;11:205. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-205

Table 3.

Weighted prevalence of intensity of impacts of the 8 performances of the Child-OIDP (n = 3272)

 
Performance
 
Oral impacts Eating (n = 1329) Speaking* (n = 642) Cleaning* (n = 1037) Relaxing (n = 640) Emotion* (n = 799) Smiling (n = 745) Study (n = 487) Socialising (n = 630) Total %
Impact intensity % (all)
40.2
19.3
31.3
19.2
24.1
22.5
14.5
18.8
 
Very Little
(12.7)
(6.4)
(8.4)
(5.5)
(6.4)
(6.3)
(4.3)
(4.9)
 
  Intervention
12.9
5.2
9.5α
5.2
5.5
6.5
4.0
4.5
50.5
  Control
12.7
7.1
6.7α
5.7
6.9
6.2
4.5
5.2
57.8
Little
(13.4)
(5.9)
(9.8)
(5.9)
(7.1)
(6.5)
(4.2)
(5.3)
 
  Intervention
12.5
6.2
9.8
5.8
8.7α
5.7
4.3
5.2
58.2
  Control
14.0
5.6
9.8
6.0
6.2α
7.0
4.1
5.3
58.0
Moderate
(9.7)
(4.9)
(8.4)
(5.2)
(6.9)
(6.3)
(4.0)
(5.8)
 
  Intervention
10.5
5.1
7.9
4.1
6.0
6.1
4.0
5.8
49.5
  Control
9.2
4.8
8.6
5.9
7.5
6.4
4.0
5.8
52.2
Severe
(3.6)
(1.6)
(3.5)
(1.9)
(2.3)
(2.1)
(1.3)
(1.8)
 
  Intervention
3.5
1.8
3.5
2.3
2.0
2.3
1.2
2.0
18.6
  Control
3.6
1.4
3.5
1.7
2.4
2.1
1.3
1.7
17.7
Very severe
(0.7)
(0.6)
(1.2)
(0.7)
(1.4)
(1.3)
(0.8)
(1.0)
 
  Intervention
0.2
0.2α
0.8
0.6
1.1
1.0
0.2
0.6
4.7
  Control 1.0 0.8α 1.5 0.7 1.6 1.5 1.1 1.3 9.5

Intervention n = 1222; Control n = 2050.

*the difference between reports by children in the intervention and control group is statistically significant, *p < 0.05.

αChi-square post hoc analysis with Bonferroni adjustment.