Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 30;30(6):671–678. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmt038

Table 3.

Comparison of documented PMP assessments and activities over 2 years

High-dose group (n = 60) Traditional dose group (n = 60) P value
Average number of visits to PMP 6.9 (4.9) 5.3 (2.7) 0.022
Assessed for
 Functional status 80.0% (48) 78.3% (47) 0.822
 Depression 91.7% (55) 95.0% (57) 0.464
 Anxiety 88.3% (53) 90.0% (54) 0.769
 Substance use/abuse 88.3% (53) 95.0% (57) 0.186
 Psychosocial stressors 65.0% (39) 63.3% (38) 0.849
Activities conducted
 Prescribed non-opioid medication for pain 45.0% (27) 65.0% (39) 0.028
 Rotated opioid prescription 23.0% (14) 18.3% (11) 0.500
 Tapered opioid prescription dose 28.3% (17) 11.7% (7) 0.022
 Administered urine drug screen 45.0% (27) 20.0% (12) 0.003
 Discussed side effects of opioid prescription 41.7% (25) 51.7% (31) 0.272
 Considered a non-pharmacological approach 71.7% (43) 67.0% (40) 0.553
 Patient participated in non-pharmacological approach 50.0% (30)  50.0% (30) 1.000
 Collaborated with mental health provider 38.3% (23) 40.0% (24) 0.852
 Consulted with a pain specialist 31.7% (19) 23.3% (14) 0.307
 Developed a pain goal 48.3% (29) 20.0% (12) 0.001

Column values indicate % (n) for categorical variables or mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables.