Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 20.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2013 Mar 15;76:183–201. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.004

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Comparison of nuisance regressions (with or without the regression of global, WM and CSF signals) on the FDvox-BOLD relationship in Cambridge dataset (n=158). Row 1 corresponds to regression combined with the Friston 24 model. Row 2 corresponds to regression combined with the Friston 24 + scrubbing model. Column 1 corresponds to no regression of global, WM or CSF signals. Column 2 corresponds to regression of WM and CSF signals. Column 3 corresponds to regression of global signal. Column 4 corresponds to regression of global, WM and CSF signals.