Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 20.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2013 Mar 15;76:183–201. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.004

Table 2.

Participant and scanning parameter details for each dataset analyzed in the current study.

Dataset N Sex
(M/F)
Age
mean/SD
TR
(ms)
TE
(ms)
Flip
Angle (°)
Slice
number
Time
points
Cambridge 176* 70/106 20.9/1.9 3000 30 85 47 119
Beijing 176* 70/106 21.2/1.9 2000 30 90 33 235**
NYU
Children
89 55/34 11.7/3.2 2000 33 90 33 176
NYU TRT 25 9/16 30.7/8.8 2000 25 90 39 197
J. Power
Children
22 11/11 8.5/1 2500 27 90 32 Varied***
J. Power
Adolescents
29 22/7 12.1/1.1 2500 27 90 32 Varied
J. Power
Adults
26 4/22 23.5/1.4 2500 27 90 32 Varied
*

There were 180 participants in the Beijing Enhanced dataset and 198 participants in the Cambridge dataset. After removing 4 participants (due to inadequate field of view or bad DARTEL spatial normalization) from the Beijing dataset, 176 participants from Cambridge dataset were selected to group-match the Beijing dataset for sex and age.

**

There were no dummy scans and no deletion of first scans from the data released in the Beijing Enhanced dataset; accordingly the first 5 time points from 240 time points were discarded in preprocessing to allow signal equilibrium and participant adaptation to scanner noise. Thus 235 time points were analyzed.

***

There were 1 – 2 scanning sessions for each participant, while 1 – 6 BOLD runs within each session and 76 – 164 time points for each run (for more details: http://fcon_1000.projects.nitrc.org/indi/retro/Power2012.html). We concatenated all the runs and sessions for each subject for analyses after slice timing correction. Of note, the concatenation caused large spikes in FD at the transition time points between runs, thus the transition time points have been removed before subsequent mean FD calculation and examination of motion-BOLD relationship.